|
A Flawed Timber Market
Former President, Jimmy
Carter is, among other things, a private timber manager. Below is an article he
wrote that appeared in the New York Times where he shares his concerns about the
American Free Trade Agreement.
Along with all the other former
presidents, I was a strong supporter of the North American Free Trade Agreement
when it was initiated in 1994. Free trade among the United States, Mexico and
Canada has, in general, been good for the people and the economies of all three
nations. However, we are now facing a crises in the marketing of lumber that
could be devastating to 10 million American landowners, 20,000 sawmill owners
and more than 700,000 workers, and also to the environment. This problem has
aroused the concern of labor, industry and environmentalists.
There are many facets to this
complicated issue, but they can be summarized in relatively simple terms. In
Canada, the national and provincial governments own 95 percent of the
timberland. In the United States, private investors own the overwhelming potion
of woodlands. Timber companies like Weyerhaeuser, Georgia-Pacific and
International Paper own another 20 percent, while the remaining 10 percent is in
public ownership, as in parks and military bases. Royalynn and I are typical
family landowners. On our relatively small woodland tracts, some of which our
family has owned for seven generations, we maintain a proper mix of hardwood and
softwood trees for optimum wildlife habitat, and we market our timber
selectively when it reaches full maturity.
We cut relatively small areas at a
time and replant as quickly as possible after harvesting. Within 10 years, we
being periodic thinning, always providing the best conditions for optimum growth
of the next generation of fullgrown trees. When we sell some mature trees, we
obtain bids from sawmill owners, who are under contract to cut under strict
conditions that protect the permanent value and productivity of the farm. It is
an almost universal practice of families like ours to protect the land from
erosion and to replant another crop immediately after harvest.
Our sawmills must pay full market
price for standing timber, saw and dress the lumber as efficiently as possible,
and sell it on the retail market. Canada has no equivalent free market for the
overwhelming portion of its timber. Provincial governments grant an annual
allowable cut to sawmill owners at whatever low price is necessary to maintain
full employment in the timber industry. These sawmills usually pay a fraction of
the price that American sawmill owners pay, creating a great disparity that is
beginning to wreak havoc with the timber industry in the United States, from the
farm family that owns some woodland to the small or large sawmill owners who
cannot compete on the retail market with the heavily subsidized lumber being
imported from Canada.
These disparities between the
American and Canadian timber industries have existed for more than 25 years. In
1996, the United States and Canada signed a five-year pact [which expired this
Spring] that tried to limit the problem by restricting Canadian exports of
lumber into the United States. But quotas are not the answer. What we need is a
permanent agreement that ensures free trade but ends the artificial price
restrictions that the Canadian government has put on timber. This will allow
both Canadian and American lumber interests to compete on equal footing.
Without a dependable timber market
in the Unites States, many landowners cannot afford to invest in reforestation
and forest maintenance, and the consequence will be land that is barren or
converted to other uses. The cost to society is great - less carbon dioxide
sequestered in the trees, a loss of air and water filtration, less green space
and wildlife, and more soil erosion and urbanization. Our family has other
personal income and can survive even if our nation's timber industry is
crippled, but hundreds of thousands of American families depend on a fair and
stable market for their livelihood. Their interests must be protected.
|