Subscribe Archives Events ContactTimberWestMadison's Lumber DirectoryAdvertiseMedia Kit LSJ Home Forestnet

Untitled Document

Logging and Sawmilling Journal October/November 2011

February 2013

On the Cover:

B.C.’s family-owned Kalesnikoff
Lumber was resourceful in a recent
mill upgrade, incorporating both new
and used equipment, and as a result
was able to get more for their capital
expenditure dollars. See the story on
the upgrade on page 8. (Cover photo
by Paul MacDonald).

Going from sawmilling to schooling
Skills training has become a critically important issue for the forest industry and the industry is responding, with a proposal by Canfor and partner the Bid Group to convert Canfor’s permanently closed Rustad sawmill in Prince George to a new trades training school.

High speed flexibility at Kalesnikoff Lumber
B.C. independent sawmiller Kalesnikoff Lumber has recently completed a significant upgrade that it expects will provide their mill with the high-speed flexibility to further expand its range of products and markets, and improve recovery.

Energy management fuels mill success

An award-winning systematic energy management approach at B.C.’s Gorman Bros. Lumber is engaging employees and driving down costs—and there is more savings to come.

Betting on the lumber turnaround
Quebec’s Cossette Brothers are betting on a turnaround in the lumber market, having purchased a closed sawmill in Ferme-Neuve, and invested $3.5 million to get it up and operating efficiently.

Energy management Fuels mill success
An award-winning systematic energy management approach at B.C.’s Gorman Bros. Lumber is engaging employees and driving down costs—and there is more savings to come.

Staying ahead of the logging curve
In close to 50 years of logging in the B.C. Interior, Stamer Logging has stayed ahead of the curve by continuing to adjust to changes, with the most recent change involving a move into high lead logging.

The Edge
Included in The Edge, Canada’s leading publication on research in the forest industry, are stories from the Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, Alberta Innovates - Bio Solutions, FPInnovations, Natural Resources Canada and Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development.

Preview: COFI’s annual conference coming up in April in Prince George
As the forest industry continues to recover and strengthen, the COFI conference is a well-timed opportunity for networking, hearing top ranked speakers, learning about key industry issues and opportunities and checking out suppliers.

Taking care of business
Despite some trying times in the Nova Scotia forest industry, Canadian Woodlands Forum’s logging contractor of the year, Highland Pulp, is working hard to take care of business, supported by the joint efforts of the three brothers who own the company, James, Robert and Kevin Tompkins, and a dedicated crew.

Pioneer prairie planers
Saskatchewan’s Zelensky Brothers have a rich history in Saskatchewan sawmilling, especially on the planing side—and it may not be over yet, if the Prince Albert pulp mill re-opens, creating a chip market.

The Last Word
Jim Stirling talks about how pending legislation in Parliament—the Fair Rail Freight Services Act—could help to even out the see-saw relationship between lumber shippers and the railways.

Tech Update — Millyard Log Loader



Bookmark and Share  Or CLICK to download a pdf of this article

The Last Word

Evening out the see-saw relationship between the railways and lumber shippers

By Jim Stirling

“There was a time in this fair land when the railroad did not run...” wrote Gordon Lightfoot in his iconic Canadian Railroad Trilogy. But it seems ever since the iron road stretched from sea to sea, it has engendered a love-hate relationship with the wood products manufacturing industries that use its services.

It is no longer just delivering products to Lightfoot’s “young growing land” but to markets increasingly offshore, diverse and competitive.

In many parts of the country, the national railways enjoy a monopolistic advantage. CN, for example, has such a situation in Canada’s largest softwood lumber producing region of central and northern British Columbia. One frustrated shipper confided his recipe for getting and maintaining the railway’s attention for his lumber shipments: become a partner with a First Nations group. That advice is simultaneously racist, cynical—and true.

The Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC) is optimistic a change may finally be in the offing through a more conventional manner. The reason is the Fair Rail Freight Services Act the federal government recently introduced in Parliament. It’s no panacea for all the lumber and other shippers’ complaints and concerns. But it is seen as a means to level the playing field.

The key word is the first one in the proposed Act’s name: fair. “This legislation by itself does not provide quality rail service,” conceded David Lindsay, president and CEO of FPAC. “However the power to hold the railway companies to a basic level of service will balance the business relationship and allow for fair business negotiation,” he asserted.

The next step is to try and move the bill as expeditiously as possible through the House of Commons.”Fast tracking the bill will be a good way to help forestry companies and other shippers move towards a balance between themselves and the railway monopolies,” continued Lindsay.

The railway companies, on the other hand, are unlikely to share that view. If the bill is stalled/shunted onto a procedural siding for whatever reasons, it will not disappoint the railways too much.

The problem in many parts of Canada is rail transportation is the only feasible way to get natural resource products to the market and end customer. It is especially vital to the small and rural communities in the hinterlands. For years, locating a sawmill for example, on or close to a rail spur has been a major logistical consideration.

The effects of delays are cumulative, reverberating domino-like down the supply chain. If lumber is late leaving the mill loading deck in central B.C. for instance, it runs the risk of arriving late in the Port of Prince Rupert. That can easily translate into missing the next ship leaving for China. The effects continue and can become further magnified by the time the lumber reaches its Asian customer.

Too many delays will fray the most understanding of trade relationships given the reality of today’s highly competitive lumber markets. All that because a train did not show up on time at some rural siding in B.C.

The railways, of course, have their own dragons to slay. But CN, for instance, has become a very large, very successful bulk transporter of export products. It’s what it does. It must sometimes seem a pain from the railway’s perspective to schedule pick up of a few cars of lumber waiting in the snow. Other larger volume freight shippers command priority. The rail companies can call the shots. And that’s the point the FPAC is trying to drive home through the legislation before the House. Think of a see-saw in the children’s playground, explained Lindsay. “The rail monopoly’s rights and privileges as the sole supplier of bulk transportation heavy weights one side of the see-saw. The imbalance in the business relationship leaves the customers on the other side of the see-saw up in the air.”

Now that’s an all too familiar feeling for many Canadian lumber shippers.

The frustrations can be many, not just the train arriving late as in the above example. Sometimes the rail cars may be available and on site in time but there aren’t enough of them. Or the rail cars might be damaged or broken. Talk to anyone preoccupied with the timely shipment of lumber—they’re the ones wearing a worried expression—and they can deliver their own litany of woes.

“The (proposed) legislation will help ensure a fair and balanced relationship between shippers and the railways by giving our forestry companies and other rail customers the right to service agreements and dispute settlement mechanisms along with significant penalties for non-compliance,” summarized Lindsay.

Although the FPAC gives the proposed legislation a passing grade, concerns remain that are either not addressed or not adequately addressed in the association’s view. One such issue is having existing confidential contracts between shipper and railway uncovered by the new legislation proposals.

What happens next in Ottawa will be key. When and how the Fair Rail Freight Services Act is passed into law will indicate whether there really is a new relationship dawning between the country’s wood products sector and the national railways.