

Features
Index Page
Contractor Profile 1
Contractor Profile 2
Contractor Profile 3
Guest Column
Manitoba Mill Upgrade
Industry Training
Sawmill Innovations
Small Sawmilling
Spotlight
Supplier Newsline
Mill Drying
Bridges & Culverts
----------------
Departments
Calendar of Events
Reader Service
Classified Ads
tech_update
-----------------
Site Information
Contact List
Past Issues Archive
Join our Listserve
Search Our Site
---------------------
|
September 2006 - The
Logging and Sawmilling Journal
BRIDGES AND CULVERTS
BUILDING IN FLEXIBILITY
A certification program in New Brunswick is providing the forest industry
with a level of flexibility that allows companies—and certified individuals—
to operate more effectively when it comes to the construction and
installation of bridges and culverts.
By George Fullerton
 |
Hugh Hambly (above, right) who
presents the certification course, and
Robert Whitney, director of continuing
education at the Maritime College of
Forest Technology. |
In an effort to maintain good water
quality in the forest, forestry
operations are continually refining
their guidelines and management, in
addition to dealing with a growing array
of provincial regulations around road
building and harvesting. While no one
questions the need and desire to maintain
water quality, the nature of bureaucracy
sometimes makes compliance with
regulations a very time-consuming—and
often frustrating—exercise.
The New Brunswick Department
of Environment (DOE) enacted Clean
Water Legislation in the 1980s and
began working with the forest industry
to ensure compliance. The department
promoted Best Management Practices for
work being done near water, and began
requiring permits for construction of
bridges or installation of culverts in brooks
and streams.
The legislation required all forestry
operations on private lands to file permit
applications for every individual bridge
and culvert installation. The department
issued work permits for a time window
of June to September, when rainfall
and water flow is generally at its lowest.
(In New Brunswick, Crown lands
operations allow smaller drainages to
be administered through the licence
operating plan.)
Each permit was accompanied by
specifications including size requirements
and installation or construction guidelines
that outlined Best Management Practices
for mitigating damage while working near
watercourses. Each installation was also
subject to a random audit by department
staff to determine if the work was carried
out according to the permit. Although the
permit system has evolved and gained
good compliance, there have traditionally
been complaints that it was slow and
awkward, and not responding effectively
to the forest industry, in particular.
“The department receives numerous
Watercourse and Wetland Alteration
permit applications through the year,
most of which come during the spring
and summer months,” explains Catherine
Poirier, a technician with the Watercourse
and Wetland Alteration program.
“A large portion of these applications
come from the forest industry for bridge
and culvert maintenance, installations
and replacements. The large volume of
applications from the forest industry alone
was bogging down the system.”
As a result of the permitting system
bottleneck, permits were slow to reach
companies and contractors doing
watercourse work. The forest industry was
but one sector that was calling upon the
DOE to streamline the system or come up
with an effective mechanism that provides
timely issuing of alteration permits. The
lobbying efforts led to a proposal to train
and certify culvert and bridge installers
and to audit their individual work to
insure compliance.
The department decided that
the forest industry could be better
served—and have alteration permits in
a more timely manner—if a certification
system was developed that provided
detailed training that covered theory and
detailed technical information related to
watercourse crossings. The department
would follow up the installers’ compliance
with regulations through auditing their
completed work.
The first step in developing the
certification scheme began in the winter
of 2002 with the development of a Best
Practices manual (in conjunction with the
Department of Natural Resources and
the Department of Fisheries and Oceans)
and a training course to certify installers in
Best Management Practices.
 |
The DOE went looking for professional
expertise to develop and offer the training
course, and they selected the Maritime
College of Forest Technology, Continuing
Education (MCTF), in Fredericton.
“It seemed that the MCFT was the
ideal choice,” says Poirer. “The school
is in the business of training forest
technologists and they understand the
techniques and challenges associated with
forest operations and road building. They
have a good working relationship with
the NB Department of Natural Resources,
they were able to meet our timelines, and
they also have experience in delivering
educational extension programs.”
Robert Whitney, director of continuing
education at MCFT, says that although
the college had been providing courses
directed at both industrial and woodlot
road construction, there was still a tight
timetable for developing a course.
“Early in 2002, we started to work
on developing the certification course
and we had also started advertising for
delivering the courses in the late spring,
prior to the 2002 installation season. We
were receiving chapters of the manual as
soon as the department signed off, and
immediately incorporating them into the
curriculum.
“It was a very intense few months,
but we were able to offer three oneweek
courses in the spring prior to the
installation season. As we finished each
course that spring, we would go back and
make a few revisions in the curriculum to
cover gaps that became evident.”
The course covers the standards of
responsibility under the certification
program, and includes the responsibilities
of the certified installer, and standards
for culvert and bridge crossings,
providing special focus on avoiding oil
spills. Students learn to read maps to
determine the drainage basin served
by the structures, and how to calculate
the proper size to handle the maximum
potential flow.
The course also reviews provincial
and federal (Department of Fisheries
and Oceans) regulations, and the
impacts of erosion and sedimentation.
The planning watercourse alterations
section emphasizes proper road location
and determining the best locations for
crossings. The culvert installation section
reviews various types of culverts, culvert
installation, fish passage and continued
maintenance.
Bridge construction, similarly, covers
sizing, building materials, and general
construction practices. The course
also covers general roadbuilding and
construction methods, underlining
that proper planning, construction and
maintenance all help to reduce the
potential of erosion and sedimentation
problems in waterways.
 |
The Watercourse Alteration
Certification program provides the
forest industry in New Brunswick
with a level of flexibility that allows
them to generally operate more
effectively. |

|
The New Brunswick certification
program allows certified installers to
make a blanket application for multiple
installations, rather than have to make
an individual application for each
crossing. The blanket application must
be submitted at least three months
prior to installation season. At the
end of the construction season, each
installer is required to submit a summary
report detailing what work they have
completed. The summary report includes
all calculations for sizing structures that
were installed or replaced. The reports
are audited by the department and a
portion of completed projects are audited
by personnel from provincial and regional
offices. If the audit finds problems with
a certified installer’s work, a warning
is issued. If an additional infraction is
discovered, the installer loses his/her
certification status.
“Poor quality work can lead to a
suspension of their certification and,
practically speaking, their ability to carry
out their work. So certified installers
have a very significant reason to do every
installation to the very highest standard
they can practically achieve,” says
Whitney.
Installer certifications are currently
automatically renewed annually unless
they are decertified (for non-compliance
reasons) or if guidelines, working
methodologies or the regulations evolve
to the point that retraining is required.
In that case, all certified installers would
have to be re-certified.
Whitney says that the Watercourse
Alteration Certification has provided
the forest industry with a level of
flexibility that allows them to operate
more effectively. “The process relies on
providing knowledge to installers and then
relying on them to act in a professional
and responsible manner in their work.
Instead of relying on the department for
guidance, certified installers have a very
high degree of ownership in the work that
they do.”
Presenting a comprehensive and
very specialized course of instruction is
a demanding task, requiring very special
teaching and human relations skills,
Whitney comments. “We were very
fortunate in that Hugh Hambly had just taken retirement from the woodlands
department of Ste Anne Nackawic, as
their mechanical superintendent for
roads and maintenance. Hugh has a
great deal of experience in industrial
forestry, particularly in road and bridge
construction and maintenance.”
Hambly is also an experienced
facilitator, conducting Contractor’s
Forum sessions with the Canadian
Woodlands Forum. “Hugh simply has
the best available instruction skills for this
particular subject and he has the skill to
impress the high level of responsibility
and professionalism that the certified
installers need to adhere to in achieving
and maintaining their accreditation.”
Whitney adds that the certification
program has transferred well outside of
New Brunswick. Nova Scotia has adopted
Watercourse Alteration Certification,
and developed it further than New
Brunswick. “They have made it clear
that in the future culvert and bridge
installers, whether in the forest industry
or other sectors, will be required to have
certification. We are also getting inquiries
from Newfoundland and as far away as
the Yukon.”
Both Poirier and Whitney conclude
that the methodologies learned
through the course have resulted in an
improvement in water quality in the
forest operations using certified installers. “The Watercourse Certification Program
has met and surpassed the department’s
expectations,” notes Poirier. “We
eventually hope to offer a similar program
for most alterations approved through
the Watercourse and Wetland Alteration
program where contractors working on
behalf of landowners or clients would
be certified, and could commence
an alteration without waiting on our
permitting process.”
|